olivierd

Universal definition of the indiscrete topology

Exercise 182 (Chapter 29, “The category of topological spaces”): Give a universal definition which leads to the introduction of the indiscrete topology on a set. On a set , the indiscrete topology is the unique topology such that for any set , any mapping is continuous. This isn’t really a universal definition. We have seen…

Read more...

Representation frameworks and representations

Chapter 22 on representations is, I feel, the worst written I have come upon up to now. I haven’t yet come to wrap my head around it. I certainly appreciate the desire to give a general definition of representations in category theory terms. This is how the author puts it: Let and be two categories….

Read more...

One universal enveloping algebra

In my search for less abstract or trivial examples of a universal enveloping algebra, I have come upon this one. Let be a vector space and a free associative algebra on . The mapping is a vector space morphism . can also be viewed as a Lie algebra. is a part of ; let be…

Read more...

No maverick elements in a free space

This keeps cropping up, and every time it takes me some effort to rediscover the proof. It happened first with free groups, then with free vector spaces and again with free Lie algebras. I’ll formulate the issue with groups, but it is easy to carry it over to other cases. A free group on set…

Read more...

“Free Object Functors”

Chapter 12 (Functors) gives as an example of a functor the “free group functor” from the category of sets () to the category of groups (). We will call this functor , and its construction, as described, is the following: For any set , the object is the free group on . Let be a…

Read more...

Functors Between Real and Complex Vector Spaces

(Unfinished) In Chapter 12, R.G. describes three possible transformations “from real to complex vector spaces and back”. Inspired by Chapter 17 (Functors), I have examined these transformations from the functor point of view. We can distinguish not two, but three categories here, the first and third of which are equivalent: : Complex vector spaces with…

Read more...

Identity functors, isofunctors and equivalent categories

Exercise 105 (Chapter 17, “Functors”): Define the identity functor from a category to that same category. What do you suppose is meant by equivalent categories? Identity functors We have encountered two flavors of identity definitions. Identity mappings on sets are defined by the way they act on set elements, namely that they don’t change them….

Read more...

Algebraic infinite sum notation

On an infinite-dimensional vector space one usually defines a linear combination as a finite sum; for instance, if is a basis of the -vector space , one may write, for some finite part of : I find this notation cumbersome, because it seems to make the sum dependent on the arbitrary choice of the finite…

Read more...